We have to transform the following sentence into clausal form:
∃x ∀y (∀z P(f(x),y,z)→(∃u Q(x,u) & ∃v R(y,v)))
Now, there are four steps to do this.
Step 1: Remove biconditional statements
A↔B = (A→B)∧(B→A)
Step 2: Remove implicative sentences.
(A→B) = ¬A∨B
Step 3: Move negation inwards
¬(A∧B) = ¬(A) ∨ ¬(B)
¬(A∨B) = ¬(A) ∧ ¬(B)
¬(¬A) = A
Step 4: Skolemization
We remove the existential quantifiers by introducing Skolem functions. We will talk about this later.
So, let us start by removing implication.
The implication is given as,
∀z P(f(x),y,z)→(∃u Q(x,u) & ∃v R(y,v))
= ¬∀z P(f(x),y,z)∨(∃u Q(x,u) & ∃v R(y,v))
Now, let us replace this in the original equation.
∃x ∀y (¬(∀z P(f(x),y,z))∨(∃u Q(x,u) & ∃v R(y,v)))
Next, we move the negation inside the bracket. We use the following formula:
¬∀x A(x) = ∃x ¬A(x)
So, we get,
∃x ∀y (∃z ¬P(f(x),y,z)∨(∃u Q(x,u) & ∃v R(y,v)))
Now, let's talk about skolemization. In artificial intelligence and logic programming, Skolemization is a process used to eliminate existential quantifiers (∃) from logical formulas. Let's introduce a Skolem constant c for x, a Skolem function g(y) for z, a Skolem function h(y) for u, and a Skolem function k(y) for v:
The equation thus becomes:
∀y (¬P(f(c),y,g(y))∨(Q(x,h(y)) & ∃v R(y,k(y))))
Now we have to convert this equation to conjunctive normal form.
∀y((¬P(f(c),y,g(y))∨Q(c,h(y)))∧(¬P(f(c),y,g(y))∨R(y,k(y))))
In clausal form, each clause is a disjunction of literals, and the formula is a conjunction of these clauses:
{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),Q(c,h(y))}
{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),R(y,k(y))}
Thus, the clausal form of the original formula is:
{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),Q(c,h(y))}∧{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),R(y,k(y))}
Expressed as a set of clauses, the clausal form is:
{{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),Q(c,h(y))},{¬P(f(c),y,g(y)),R(y,k(y))}}
Comments